https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311872 Omission to mention Section 302 IPC in the charge did not vitiate the murder-conspiracy conviction because the charge clearly informed the accused of the substance of the allegation, he raised no objection at trial or before the HC, and no prejudice or failure of justice was shown. The Court applied the principle that defects in charge are not fatal unless they mislead the accused. On criminal conspiracy, the SC held that voice identification by a witness familiar with the caller, reinforced by threatening calls, call records and surrounding circumstances, was sufficient to prove agreement under Section 120B IPC. The concurrent findings were not shown to be perverse, so the conviction was upheld. en-us Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:29:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311872 Omission to mention Section 302 IPC in the charge did not vitiate the murder-conspiracy conviction because the charge clearly informed the accused of the substance of the allegation, he raised no objection at trial or before the HC, and no prejudice or failure of justice was shown. The Court applied the principle that defects in charge are not fatal unless they mislead the accused. On criminal conspiracy, the SC held that voice identification by a witness familiar with the caller, reinforced by threatening calls, call records and surrounding circumstances, was sufficient to prove agreement under Section 120B IPC. The concurrent findings were not shown to be perverse, so the conviction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311872