<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 801 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448402</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under Section 147. The petitioner claimed deductions for advertising/marketing expenses and loan processing charges. The court held that since no corresponding revenue was recognized, marketing expenses should be classified as work-in-progress rather than revenue expenditure. The Section 148 notice was issued within four years before income escaped assessment, making reopening valid. The court found no final tax liability determination in the impugned order and granted liberty to raise objections before the Assessing Officer during reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 801 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448402</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging reopening of assessment under Section 147. The petitioner claimed deductions for advertising/marketing expenses and loan processing charges. The court held that since no corresponding revenue was recognized, marketing expenses should be classified as work-in-progress rather than revenue expenditure. The Section 148 notice was issued within four years before income escaped assessment, making reopening valid. The court found no final tax liability determination in the impugned order and granted liberty to raise objections before the Assessing Officer during reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>