<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 797 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits of Rs. 41,16,000/-, as the assessee successfully explained the source of these deposits with legitimate documentation. The challenge to the assumption under section 153A was dismissed due to lack of argument. Consequently, the concealment penalty under section 271(1)(c) was also deleted. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee. Judgment was pronounced on 16/01/2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 797 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits of Rs. 41,16,000/-, as the assessee successfully explained the source of these deposits with legitimate documentation. The challenge to the assumption under section 153A was dismissed due to lack of argument. Consequently, the concealment penalty under section 271(1)(c) was also deleted. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee. Judgment was pronounced on 16/01/2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>