<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 178 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35458</link>
    <description>A marginal five-day delay in filing the departmental appeal was treated as sufficiently explained, and the Tribunal held the explanation justifiable. The delay was therefore condoned and the appeal was directed to be taken on record. The Tribunal also emphasised the need for timely review and prompt filing of appeals by departmental authorities, indicating that procedural diligence remains important even where delay is short.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 178 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35458</link>
      <description>A marginal five-day delay in filing the departmental appeal was treated as sufficiently explained, and the Tribunal held the explanation justifiable. The delay was therefore condoned and the appeal was directed to be taken on record. The Tribunal also emphasised the need for timely review and prompt filing of appeals by departmental authorities, indicating that procedural diligence remains important even where delay is short.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>