<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 792 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448393</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disallowance of spill-over additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) in assessment under sections 153C/153A. The tribunal held that since the original assessment under section 143(3)/144C(13) had allowed the depreciation claim and became final before the search, the AO could not reverse this decision without incriminating material found during search. For assessment year 2008-09, being an un-abated assessment, the AO&#039;s action of withdrawing previously allowed claims without seized materials was legally unsustainable. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 23:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 792 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448393</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding disallowance of spill-over additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) in assessment under sections 153C/153A. The tribunal held that since the original assessment under section 143(3)/144C(13) had allowed the depreciation claim and became final before the search, the AO could not reverse this decision without incriminating material found during search. For assessment year 2008-09, being an un-abated assessment, the AO&#039;s action of withdrawing previously allowed claims without seized materials was legally unsustainable. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>