<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 784 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448385</link>
    <description>Misdeclaration of imported goods in description, weight and value justified confiscation where examination showed the goods were old, unmutilated mixed hosiery clothing, not completely pre-mutilated rags as declared. The goods were treated as restricted imports under the foreign trade regime and could be imported only against a valid licence or authorisation. Because the importer filed the bill of entry on self-assessment basis, it was bound to make a truthful declaration of the contents and particulars of the consignment; the mismatch supported redetermination of value and attracted penal consequences. The redemption fine was also found proportionate to the assessable value, so the challenge to confiscation, redemption fine and penalty failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 784 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448385</link>
      <description>Misdeclaration of imported goods in description, weight and value justified confiscation where examination showed the goods were old, unmutilated mixed hosiery clothing, not completely pre-mutilated rags as declared. The goods were treated as restricted imports under the foreign trade regime and could be imported only against a valid licence or authorisation. Because the importer filed the bill of entry on self-assessment basis, it was bound to make a truthful declaration of the contents and particulars of the consignment; the mismatch supported redetermination of value and attracted penal consequences. The redemption fine was also found proportionate to the assessable value, so the challenge to confiscation, redemption fine and penalty failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>