<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 768 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448369</link>
    <description>For entry tax under the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2007, the value of goods may include transportation-related and purchase-related charges only if they fall within the statutory definition and are incurred before entry into the local area. Where the timing and nature of coal unloading charges, loco diesel charges, and loco staff salary were not examined, inclusion of those amounts in the tax base was unsustainable and required fresh consideration. By contrast, the levy on contractor purchases against Form 38 was sustained because the assessee had not furnished the form, and no legal infirmity was found in the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 768 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448369</link>
      <description>For entry tax under the Uttar Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2007, the value of goods may include transportation-related and purchase-related charges only if they fall within the statutory definition and are incurred before entry into the local area. Where the timing and nature of coal unloading charges, loco diesel charges, and loco staff salary were not examined, inclusion of those amounts in the tax base was unsustainable and required fresh consideration. By contrast, the levy on contractor purchases against Form 38 was sustained because the assessee had not furnished the form, and no legal infirmity was found in the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>