<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 767 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448368</link>
    <description>Inordinate delay in filing tax appeals will not be condoned unless the applicant shows sufficient cause through a credible, satisfactory and diligent explanation throughout the period of delay. The Court found the delay excessive and inadequately explained, noting prolonged departmental inaction after preparation of the draft appeal and a casual, leisurely approach to prosecution of the matter. Official commitments and election duty were held insufficient to excuse the lapse, and authorities cited by the appellant were distinguished on their facts. The delay was therefore not condoned, the condonation applications failed, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 767 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448368</link>
      <description>Inordinate delay in filing tax appeals will not be condoned unless the applicant shows sufficient cause through a credible, satisfactory and diligent explanation throughout the period of delay. The Court found the delay excessive and inadequately explained, noting prolonged departmental inaction after preparation of the draft appeal and a casual, leisurely approach to prosecution of the matter. Official commitments and election duty were held insufficient to excuse the lapse, and authorities cited by the appellant were distinguished on their facts. The delay was therefore not condoned, the condonation applications failed, and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>