<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 1018 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311854</link>
    <description>Blending and packing of tea does not amount to manufacture under the U.P. Trade Tax Act because manufacture requires the emergence of a new commercial commodity. If the processed product retains the same commercial identity in market parlance, the activity remains outside manufacture. On that principle, tea continues to be tea after blending and packing, so no new commodity comes into existence. The issue is therefore resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 14:56:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 1018 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311854</link>
      <description>Blending and packing of tea does not amount to manufacture under the U.P. Trade Tax Act because manufacture requires the emergence of a new commercial commodity. If the processed product retains the same commercial identity in market parlance, the activity remains outside manufacture. On that principle, tea continues to be tea after blending and packing, so no new commodity comes into existence. The issue is therefore resolved in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>