<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448365</link>
    <description>HC ruled that GST registration cancellation with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 was improper. The court found no valid justification for retrospective cancellation under Section 29(2) of CGST Act. The registration cancellation was modified to be effective from the petitioner&#039;s application date of 25.02.2019, allowing tax authorities to pursue legitimate recovery measures while ensuring procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448365</link>
      <description>HC ruled that GST registration cancellation with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 was improper. The court found no valid justification for retrospective cancellation under Section 29(2) of CGST Act. The registration cancellation was modified to be effective from the petitioner&#039;s application date of 25.02.2019, allowing tax authorities to pursue legitimate recovery measures while ensuring procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>