https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448361 The HC dismissed the petition challenging transfer of the petitioner's assessment from one ITO jurisdiction to another DCIT under Section 127. The court held notice was issued, objections were heard, and reasons-primarily the need for a coordinated, centralized investigation given entities across multiple cities-were recorded in the order. Consequential proceedings and notices under Section 142 had already commenced and survey evidence indicated unexplained cash transactions and lack of supporting documents. The HC found statutory requirements satisfied and no grounds for interfering with the transfer order. en-us Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Sep 2025 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448361 The HC dismissed the petition challenging transfer of the petitioner's assessment from one ITO jurisdiction to another DCIT under Section 127. The court held notice was issued, objections were heard, and reasons-primarily the need for a coordinated, centralized investigation given entities across multiple cities-were recorded in the order. Consequential proceedings and notices under Section 142 had already commenced and survey evidence indicated unexplained cash transactions and lack of supporting documents. The HC found statutory requirements satisfied and no grounds for interfering with the transfer order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 08 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448361