<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 743 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448344</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad ruled on unexplained money additions under section 69A. The tribunal deleted a Rs. 10 lakh addition for cash gift from assessee&#039;s wife, accepting her confirmation and income return as sufficient proof since spouses fall under exempt relatives category. However, it upheld Rs. 2.40 lakh addition for alleged gift from deceased father due to lack of supporting documentation or income return. The tribunal also deleted Rs. 5 lakh addition for cash withdrawal from partnership firm, finding adequate proof through firm&#039;s confirmation and financial records. Addition for undocumented opening cash balance was sustained. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 743 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448344</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad ruled on unexplained money additions under section 69A. The tribunal deleted a Rs. 10 lakh addition for cash gift from assessee&#039;s wife, accepting her confirmation and income return as sufficient proof since spouses fall under exempt relatives category. However, it upheld Rs. 2.40 lakh addition for alleged gift from deceased father due to lack of supporting documentation or income return. The tribunal also deleted Rs. 5 lakh addition for cash withdrawal from partnership firm, finding adequate proof through firm&#039;s confirmation and financial records. Addition for undocumented opening cash balance was sustained. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>