https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448338 CESTAT New Delhi upheld the revocation of a customs broker license for violations of CBLR regulations. The appellant failed to discharge responsibilities during goods examination, did not inform authorities of discrepancies as required under Regulation 10(d) and 10(m), and failed to advise the importer about regulatory compliance requirements. The G card holder admitted to not reporting discrepancies to Assistant/Deputy Commissioner. CESTAT held that once CBLR violations are established, the Commissioner has authority to revoke the license and forfeit security deposits. The tribunal found no irregularity in the adjudicating authority's decision and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that interference is justified only when punishment shocks conscience. en-us Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:43:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448338 CESTAT New Delhi upheld the revocation of a customs broker license for violations of CBLR regulations. The appellant failed to discharge responsibilities during goods examination, did not inform authorities of discrepancies as required under Regulation 10(d) and 10(m), and failed to advise the importer about regulatory compliance requirements. The G card holder admitted to not reporting discrepancies to Assistant/Deputy Commissioner. CESTAT held that once CBLR violations are established, the Commissioner has authority to revoke the license and forfeit security deposits. The tribunal found no irregularity in the adjudicating authority's decision and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that interference is justified only when punishment shocks conscience. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448338