<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 732 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448333</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a PMLA prosecution was considered on the basis of the investigation material, the admissibility of Section 50 statements, the absence of identifiable proceeds of crime, and the petitioner&#039;s medical condition. The Court noted that statements recorded under Section 50 are admissible, though their evidentiary weight remains for trial. On the facts, the alleged forged export documentation and outward remittances did not disclose proceeds of crime in the statutory sense required for PMLA liability. The petitioner&#039;s renal ailments and repeated kidney surgeries were also treated as relevant to bail, and anticipatory bail was granted subject to cooperation, passport surrender, periodic appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and disclosure of contact details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 732 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448333</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a PMLA prosecution was considered on the basis of the investigation material, the admissibility of Section 50 statements, the absence of identifiable proceeds of crime, and the petitioner&#039;s medical condition. The Court noted that statements recorded under Section 50 are admissible, though their evidentiary weight remains for trial. On the facts, the alleged forged export documentation and outward remittances did not disclose proceeds of crime in the statutory sense required for PMLA liability. The petitioner&#039;s renal ailments and repeated kidney surgeries were also treated as relevant to bail, and anticipatory bail was granted subject to cooperation, passport surrender, periodic appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and disclosure of contact details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>