<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 715 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448316</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Commissioner for reconsideration. The appellant was not held responsible for the duty demand as he had resigned from the partnership firm before the relevant period. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to pass a fresh order within two months, emphasizing the need to adhere to the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:42:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 715 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448316</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, remanding the case to the Commissioner for reconsideration. The appellant was not held responsible for the duty demand as he had resigned from the partnership firm before the relevant period. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to pass a fresh order within two months, emphasizing the need to adhere to the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>