<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 189 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35440</link>
    <description>Credit of additional excise duty availed before 1-4-2000 could not be utilised towards payment of basic excise duty after the retrospective amendment to the credit rule. The amendment, made on 10-9-2004 with retrospective effect, expressly barred use of such pre-1-4-2000 credit for basic excise duty, and the admitted utilisation in 2003 was therefore impermissible. The CESTAT held the amended restriction to be effective against the assessee and upheld the Revenue&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 189 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35440</link>
      <description>Credit of additional excise duty availed before 1-4-2000 could not be utilised towards payment of basic excise duty after the retrospective amendment to the credit rule. The amendment, made on 10-9-2004 with retrospective effect, expressly barred use of such pre-1-4-2000 credit for basic excise duty, and the admitted utilisation in 2003 was therefore impermissible. The CESTAT held the amended restriction to be effective against the assessee and upheld the Revenue&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>