<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 89 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35434</link>
    <description>Plugs and sockets imported for classification under an exemption notification were treated by the majority as &quot;connectors&quot; because the tariff heading itself used the generic expression &quot;plugs, sockets, lamp holders and other connectors,&quot; and the notification granted relief to connectors without narrowing that term to a sub-classification. The majority also relied on the import documents and catalogue describing the goods as connectors or female connectors, and distinguished an earlier Revenue citation as arising under a different tariff and notification scheme. A dissent held that plugs and sockets were separately classifiable and outside the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 89 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35434</link>
      <description>Plugs and sockets imported for classification under an exemption notification were treated by the majority as &quot;connectors&quot; because the tariff heading itself used the generic expression &quot;plugs, sockets, lamp holders and other connectors,&quot; and the notification granted relief to connectors without narrowing that term to a sub-classification. The majority also relied on the import documents and catalogue describing the goods as connectors or female connectors, and distinguished an earlier Revenue citation as arising under a different tariff and notification scheme. A dissent held that plugs and sockets were separately classifiable and outside the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>