<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 709 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448310</link>
    <description>HC examined challenge to assessment order and penalty under CGST/SGST Act. Petitioner contested Rs. 11,57,682.60 penalty imposed by Assessing Authority, challenging lack of GST Tribunal. HC granted interim relief by restraining bank guarantee invocation, conditional on petitioner depositing additional 10% of assessed penalty, pending final resolution of writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 709 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448310</link>
      <description>HC examined challenge to assessment order and penalty under CGST/SGST Act. Petitioner contested Rs. 11,57,682.60 penalty imposed by Assessing Authority, challenging lack of GST Tribunal. HC granted interim relief by restraining bank guarantee invocation, conditional on petitioner depositing additional 10% of assessed penalty, pending final resolution of writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>