https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448299 The HC quashed the impugned orders due to inadequate opportunity provided to the petitioners in proceedings under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found the orders unsustainable as the petitioners were not furnished with requested documents and thus could not adequately respond. The cases were remitted back to the respondent for fresh consideration on merits, directing the respondent to provide the requested documents within four weeks, allowing the petitioners to respond within four weeks thereafter, and requiring the respondent to pass appropriate orders within four weeks following receipt of responses. Writ petitions were disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:34:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448299 The HC quashed the impugned orders due to inadequate opportunity provided to the petitioners in proceedings under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found the orders unsustainable as the petitioners were not furnished with requested documents and thus could not adequately respond. The cases were remitted back to the respondent for fresh consideration on merits, directing the respondent to provide the requested documents within four weeks, allowing the petitioners to respond within four weeks thereafter, and requiring the respondent to pass appropriate orders within four weeks following receipt of responses. Writ petitions were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448299