<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448273</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal concerning clandestine production and removal allegations. The case involved demand based on notebooks recovered from a director&#039;s residence. The Tribunal held that private records alone cannot establish clandestine removal without corroborative evidence. The department failed to investigate entries or verify unaccounted raw material receipts and finished goods sales. The director&#039;s retracted statement and lack of independent evidence supporting the allegations rendered the demand unsustainable. Revenue could not discharge burden of proof through seized notebooks without substantive corroboration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448273</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal concerning clandestine production and removal allegations. The case involved demand based on notebooks recovered from a director&#039;s residence. The Tribunal held that private records alone cannot establish clandestine removal without corroborative evidence. The department failed to investigate entries or verify unaccounted raw material receipts and finished goods sales. The director&#039;s retracted statement and lack of independent evidence supporting the allegations rendered the demand unsustainable. Revenue could not discharge burden of proof through seized notebooks without substantive corroboration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>