https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448267 HC upheld conviction under Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheque due to insufficient funds. Accused admitted cheque dishonour in statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. Court applied Section 146 presumption regarding memo correctness. Despite accused's claim of non-receipt of demand notice, court followed precedent requiring payment within 15 days of court summons receipt. Accused failed to pay amount to complainant. Prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt establishing cheque issued for legal liability discharge, dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and non-payment despite valid notice. Revision dismissed, conviction and sentence upheld. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:32:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448267 HC upheld conviction under Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheque due to insufficient funds. Accused admitted cheque dishonour in statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. Court applied Section 146 presumption regarding memo correctness. Despite accused's claim of non-receipt of demand notice, court followed precedent requiring payment within 15 days of court summons receipt. Accused failed to pay amount to complainant. Prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt establishing cheque issued for legal liability discharge, dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and non-payment despite valid notice. Revision dismissed, conviction and sentence upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448267