https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448265 Bombay HC held that a company's customary practice requiring daily attendance marking at factory gate to receive subsistence allowance during suspension violates Section 10(A) of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. The court ruled that statutory provisions supersede customary practices, and suspended employees need only inform employers they are not gainfully employed elsewhere. The HC quashed the tribunal award, directing payment of 50% subsistence allowance from suspension date until termination with 10% simple interest per annum. en-us Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:32:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448265 Bombay HC held that a company's customary practice requiring daily attendance marking at factory gate to receive subsistence allowance during suspension violates Section 10(A) of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. The court ruled that statutory provisions supersede customary practices, and suspended employees need only inform employers they are not gainfully employed elsewhere. The HC quashed the tribunal award, directing payment of 50% subsistence allowance from suspension date until termination with 10% simple interest per annum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448265