https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311827 Regular bail was granted where the applicant had remained in custody since 05.11.2022, the investigation was complete and the charge-sheet had been filed. The Court noted that the allegations did not show the applicant as the beneficiary of the alleged GST-credit fraud and indicated participation under the main accused. It also considered the absence of past antecedents and exercised discretion in favour of release without a detailed examination of the evidence. The applicant was held entitled to regular bail under Section 439 CrPC. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311827 Regular bail was granted where the applicant had remained in custody since 05.11.2022, the investigation was complete and the charge-sheet had been filed. The Court noted that the allegations did not show the applicant as the beneficiary of the alleged GST-credit fraud and indicated participation under the main accused. It also considered the absence of past antecedents and exercised discretion in favour of release without a detailed examination of the evidence. The applicant was held entitled to regular bail under Section 439 CrPC. Case-Laws GST Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311827