<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 239 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of duty and penalty imposed on the appellant. The decision was based on grounds of limitation and revenue neutrality. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely action by the Revenue in addressing disputes over assessable values and the availability of credits in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 239 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand of duty and penalty imposed on the appellant. The decision was based on grounds of limitation and revenue neutrality. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely action by the Revenue in addressing disputes over assessable values and the availability of credits in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>