https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448230 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by the appellant, a cement manufacturer, who had availed exemptions under Notification No.50/2003-CE and Notification No.67/1995-CE. The Tribunal found that the appellant correctly discharged obligations under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as clarified by the SC. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to the exemptions on clinker and cement, reversing the earlier demand for Central Excise Duty. en-us Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:05:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448230 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by the appellant, a cement manufacturer, who had availed exemptions under Notification No.50/2003-CE and Notification No.67/1995-CE. The Tribunal found that the appellant correctly discharged obligations under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as clarified by the SC. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to the exemptions on clinker and cement, reversing the earlier demand for Central Excise Duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448230