https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311812 Judicial review of disciplinary proceedings is limited to perversity, absence of evidence, jurisdictional error, or breach of natural justice, and does not permit reappreciation of evidence. Where the employee was a joint custodian of cash and keys and concurrent departmental findings on documentary material proved the charges, the High Court could not interfere on an incorrect factual premise. Bare allegations of bias, unproved prejudice from alleged non-supply of documents, and reasons contained in the disciplinary and appellate orders were insufficient to vitiate the inquiry. The High Court was set aside and the modified disciplinary punishment was restored. en-us Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 14 Jan 2024 09:29:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311812 Judicial review of disciplinary proceedings is limited to perversity, absence of evidence, jurisdictional error, or breach of natural justice, and does not permit reappreciation of evidence. Where the employee was a joint custodian of cash and keys and concurrent departmental findings on documentary material proved the charges, the High Court could not interfere on an incorrect factual premise. Bare allegations of bias, unproved prejudice from alleged non-supply of documents, and reasons contained in the disciplinary and appellate orders were insufficient to vitiate the inquiry. The High Court was set aside and the modified disciplinary punishment was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311812