https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311801 Section 482 CrPC was noted as unavailable for routinely quashing or interfering with a sentence in a cheque dishonour prosecution under Section 138 NI Act merely because of a later settlement and claimed compensation payment. The commentary treats a cited precedent as confined to its exceptional facts, and states that any question whether compensation was fully discharged must be satisfied before the Magistrate. If compensation was in fact paid, the default sentence could not be executed, but that did not justify quashing the sentence through inherent jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jan 2024 18:25:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311801 Section 482 CrPC was noted as unavailable for routinely quashing or interfering with a sentence in a cheque dishonour prosecution under Section 138 NI Act merely because of a later settlement and claimed compensation payment. The commentary treats a cited precedent as confined to its exceptional facts, and states that any question whether compensation was fully discharged must be satisfied before the Magistrate. If compensation was in fact paid, the default sentence could not be executed, but that did not justify quashing the sentence through inherent jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311801