<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 626 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448227</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging a CGST circular regarding Input Tax Credit verification. The petitioner contested a circular about fake invoices and inadmissible tax credits issued by Joint Commissioner. Court found the petitioner was not an aggrieved party, as adjudication proceedings were based on legitimate authority findings. Petition was deemed speculative and lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 626 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448227</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging a CGST circular regarding Input Tax Credit verification. The petitioner contested a circular about fake invoices and inadmissible tax credits issued by Joint Commissioner. Court found the petitioner was not an aggrieved party, as adjudication proceedings were based on legitimate authority findings. Petition was deemed speculative and lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>