<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 399 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the misdeclaration of imported goods as nails instead of heavy melting scrap, leading to the confiscation of the goods and reassessment of duty. The Tribunal also supported the Commissioner&#039;s valuation methodology based on similar goods&#039; import values and raw material costs, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 399 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the misdeclaration of imported goods as nails instead of heavy melting scrap, leading to the confiscation of the goods and reassessment of duty. The Tribunal also supported the Commissioner&#039;s valuation methodology based on similar goods&#039; import values and raw material costs, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>