<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 620 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448221</link>
    <description>A writ petition was disposed of because an efficacious alternative appellate remedy was available, so the court declined to entertain the writ on merits. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to pursue the appeal remedy, and interim protection against coercive recovery was continued for the stipulated period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 620 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448221</link>
      <description>A writ petition was disposed of because an efficacious alternative appellate remedy was available, so the court declined to entertain the writ on merits. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to pursue the appeal remedy, and interim protection against coercive recovery was continued for the stipulated period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>