<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 600 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448201</link>
    <description>ITAT Chandigarh ruled in favor of the assessee society regarding TDS provisions under section 194C on External Development Charges paid to GMADA. The tribunal held that TDS provisions do not apply to EDC payments made to GMADA as the authority was not functioning as a contractor on behalf of the assessee. Following precedent from H.P. Singh case with identical facts, the tribunal set aside the demand raised under sections 201(1) and 201(1A), concluding that section 194C provisions are not attracted to such payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 600 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448201</link>
      <description>ITAT Chandigarh ruled in favor of the assessee society regarding TDS provisions under section 194C on External Development Charges paid to GMADA. The tribunal held that TDS provisions do not apply to EDC payments made to GMADA as the authority was not functioning as a contractor on behalf of the assessee. Following precedent from H.P. Singh case with identical facts, the tribunal set aside the demand raised under sections 201(1) and 201(1A), concluding that section 194C provisions are not attracted to such payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>