<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 585 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448186</link>
    <description>The NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal by a suspended director challenging approval of a resolution plan valued below liquidation value. The tribunal held that Federal Bank&#039;s debt transferee Edelweiss had no grievance regarding Committee of Creditors constitution as they failed to file claims despite public announcement. The suspended director lacked locus standi to challenge the approved plan, as promoters/shareholders cannot contest resolution plans post-approval. The tribunal upheld the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in approving the plan below liquidation value, noting the Code doesn&#039;t mandate resolution plans exceed liquidation value. An operational creditor&#039;s voluntary acceptance of lower payment negated discrimination claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2024 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 585 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448186</link>
      <description>The NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal by a suspended director challenging approval of a resolution plan valued below liquidation value. The tribunal held that Federal Bank&#039;s debt transferee Edelweiss had no grievance regarding Committee of Creditors constitution as they failed to file claims despite public announcement. The suspended director lacked locus standi to challenge the approved plan, as promoters/shareholders cannot contest resolution plans post-approval. The tribunal upheld the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in approving the plan below liquidation value, noting the Code doesn&#039;t mandate resolution plans exceed liquidation value. An operational creditor&#039;s voluntary acceptance of lower payment negated discrimination claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>