<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 203 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal was found to have decided the demand issue on a new point not earlier raised by the assessee, without disturbing the findings of the original authority or the Commissioner (Appeals). The Supreme Court held that the matter required deeper consideration and that the Tribunal should re-examine the issue in accordance with law. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on the demand was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 203 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal was found to have decided the demand issue on a new point not earlier raised by the assessee, without disturbing the findings of the original authority or the Commissioner (Appeals). The Supreme Court held that the matter required deeper consideration and that the Tribunal should re-examine the issue in accordance with law. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on the demand was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>