<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2139 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311789</link>
    <description>Seized imported goods were directed to be provisionally released on furnishing a bank guarantee while adjudication remained pending and sample testing was awaited. The HC did not decide whether the material constituted hazardous waste, as the dispute was confined to interim release and the petitioners offered security for the amount involved. Release was therefore allowed subject to the pending confiscation proceedings and the outcome of the laboratory test.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2024 08:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2139 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311789</link>
      <description>Seized imported goods were directed to be provisionally released on furnishing a bank guarantee while adjudication remained pending and sample testing was awaited. The HC did not decide whether the material constituted hazardous waste, as the dispute was confined to interim release and the petitioners offered security for the amount involved. Release was therefore allowed subject to the pending confiscation proceedings and the outcome of the laboratory test.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>