<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1719 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311783</link>
    <description>NCLT Chennai sanctioned a scheme of amalgamation with appointed date of 1st April, 2015. The tribunal found the accounting treatment complied with established standards and would not prejudice creditors or stakeholders. All statutory compliances under section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 were satisfied. The scheme was deemed fair, reasonable, not contrary to public policy, and not violative of any legal provisions. The sanctioned scheme is binding on all members, creditors and shareholders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2024 08:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1719 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311783</link>
      <description>NCLT Chennai sanctioned a scheme of amalgamation with appointed date of 1st April, 2015. The tribunal found the accounting treatment complied with established standards and would not prejudice creditors or stakeholders. All statutory compliances under section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 were satisfied. The scheme was deemed fair, reasonable, not contrary to public policy, and not violative of any legal provisions. The sanctioned scheme is binding on all members, creditors and shareholders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>