<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Reassessment Challenged: Lack of Evidence in Loan Case Leads to High Court Reconsideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74129</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 - proposal to tax the same u/s 115BBE - According to the petitioner, the sum represented a genuine unsecured loan from an entity - There is nothing to indicate that the appellate authority independently applied his mind. The conclusions are in the nature of ipse dixit and no supporting reasons are discernible. - Matter restored back for re-consideration - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:30:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Reassessment Challenged: Lack of Evidence in Loan Case Leads to High Court Reconsideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74129</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 - proposal to tax the same u/s 115BBE - According to the petitioner, the sum represented a genuine unsecured loan from an entity - There is nothing to indicate that the appellate authority independently applied his mind. The conclusions are in the nature of ipse dixit and no supporting reasons are discernible. - Matter restored back for re-consideration - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:30:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>