<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1342 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311775</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, reversing the decisions of the AO and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Tribunal ruled that the assessee was entitled to the foreign tax credit of Rs. 17,72,470 under section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite the delayed filing of Form-67. The Tribunal emphasized that the technicality of the late filing should not prevent the assessee from receiving the legitimate foreign tax credit, especially given the tax deduction occurred in the UK.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:42:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1342 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311775</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, reversing the decisions of the AO and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Tribunal ruled that the assessee was entitled to the foreign tax credit of Rs. 17,72,470 under section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite the delayed filing of Form-67. The Tribunal emphasized that the technicality of the late filing should not prevent the assessee from receiving the legitimate foreign tax credit, especially given the tax deduction occurred in the UK.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>