<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2020 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311765</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the credit earned on molasses can be utilized for the payment of duty on sugar. The court aligned with a similar decision by the Madras HC, concluding that molasses, as a by-product of sugar manufacturing, qualifies as an input for sugar production. Consequently, the First Appeal was disposed of in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:42:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2020 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311765</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the credit earned on molasses can be utilized for the payment of duty on sugar. The court aligned with a similar decision by the Madras HC, concluding that molasses, as a by-product of sugar manufacturing, qualifies as an input for sugar production. Consequently, the First Appeal was disposed of in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>