https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311759 The Court allowed the appellant's application to condone a 52-day delay in refiling the appeal due to the late payment of the required court fee. It also permitted rectification of the deficiency in court fee. The appellant's challenge to the lower Courts' judgments, which decreed the respondent's suit for recovery of a specific amount, was dismissed. The Court held that the suit was not time-barred, as the appellant's issuance of a cheque in 2007 acknowledged the debt, thus falling within the limitation period. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, affirming the lower Courts' findings. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:42:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311759 The Court allowed the appellant's application to condone a 52-day delay in refiling the appeal due to the late payment of the required court fee. It also permitted rectification of the deficiency in court fee. The appellant's challenge to the lower Courts' judgments, which decreed the respondent's suit for recovery of a specific amount, was dismissed. The Court held that the suit was not time-barred, as the appellant's issuance of a cheque in 2007 acknowledged the debt, thus falling within the limitation period. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit, affirming the lower Courts' findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311759