<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 545 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448146</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding depreciation on assets used for more than 180 days, upholding CIT-A&#039;s direction to provide commissioning details to AO for correct computation. On government grant subsidy income recognition, matter was restored to AO for fresh adjudication following precedent. CIT-A&#039;s enhancement of assessed income without providing reasonable opportunity of hearing was set aside as violative of section 251(2). Regarding unpaid service tax under section 43B, ITAT directed AO to allow deduction in year of actual payment. MAT computation appeal dismissed as deferred tax assets disallowance was covered by amended explanation 1 to section 115JB with retrospective effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 545 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448146</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding depreciation on assets used for more than 180 days, upholding CIT-A&#039;s direction to provide commissioning details to AO for correct computation. On government grant subsidy income recognition, matter was restored to AO for fresh adjudication following precedent. CIT-A&#039;s enhancement of assessed income without providing reasonable opportunity of hearing was set aside as violative of section 251(2). Regarding unpaid service tax under section 43B, ITAT directed AO to allow deduction in year of actual payment. MAT computation appeal dismissed as deferred tax assets disallowance was covered by amended explanation 1 to section 115JB with retrospective effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>