<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 538 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448139</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed a writ petition challenging DRI&#039;s show cause notice regarding diversion of duty-free imported gold under Advance Authorization Scheme. The court held that bank account attachments had automatically ceased after the statutory six-month period expired. While petitioner argued 53 kg gold bars were found in declared premises and shouldn&#039;t have been seized, the court declined to adjudicate factual disputes in writ proceedings. The court ruled that unless a show cause notice is ex facie without jurisdiction, writ petitions shouldn&#039;t be entertained when contentions can be raised before the adjudicating authority. Petitioner was directed to seek license extension/revalidation after adjudication of the show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 538 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448139</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed a writ petition challenging DRI&#039;s show cause notice regarding diversion of duty-free imported gold under Advance Authorization Scheme. The court held that bank account attachments had automatically ceased after the statutory six-month period expired. While petitioner argued 53 kg gold bars were found in declared premises and shouldn&#039;t have been seized, the court declined to adjudicate factual disputes in writ proceedings. The court ruled that unless a show cause notice is ex facie without jurisdiction, writ petitions shouldn&#039;t be entertained when contentions can be raised before the adjudicating authority. Petitioner was directed to seek license extension/revalidation after adjudication of the show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>