<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35389</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision setting aside the rejection of a trust&#039;s registration under section 12AA and exemption under section 80G(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the Commissioner&#039;s requirement for an amended trust deed was extrastatutory, emphasizing that timely application for registration was crucial and certain conditions could not be imposed. The Tribunal&#039;s order was upheld, remitting the issue for fresh consideration with a reasonable opportunity for the trust to be heard. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating no substantial legal question arose from the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35389</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision setting aside the rejection of a trust&#039;s registration under section 12AA and exemption under section 80G(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the Commissioner&#039;s requirement for an amended trust deed was extrastatutory, emphasizing that timely application for registration was crucial and certain conditions could not be imposed. The Tribunal&#039;s order was upheld, remitting the issue for fresh consideration with a reasonable opportunity for the trust to be heard. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating no substantial legal question arose from the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>