<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 508 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448109</link>
    <description>A delegated rule cannot impose a limitation period that extinguishes a statutory refund right where the parent Act does not authorise such restriction. On that basis, rejection of the refund claim as time-barred under the rule was unsustainable. Outstanding dues could be adjusted only within the limits of the Act and Rules, and later-arising dues could not be used to defeat a pending refund claim. Prolonged delay in processing the application, without satisfactory explanation, also supported the taxpayer&#039;s entitlement to statutory interest. The refund rejections were quashed and the authorities were directed to compute the refund with interest in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 508 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448109</link>
      <description>A delegated rule cannot impose a limitation period that extinguishes a statutory refund right where the parent Act does not authorise such restriction. On that basis, rejection of the refund claim as time-barred under the rule was unsustainable. Outstanding dues could be adjusted only within the limits of the Act and Rules, and later-arising dues could not be used to defeat a pending refund claim. Prolonged delay in processing the application, without satisfactory explanation, also supported the taxpayer&#039;s entitlement to statutory interest. The refund rejections were quashed and the authorities were directed to compute the refund with interest in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>