<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1448 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311744</link>
    <description>A notice issued under Section 24(1) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 was challenged on the ground that its legality was already covered by an earlier Supreme Court decision and a subsequent order following that decision. On the parties&#039; joint submission and the covered nature of the issue, the challenge was accepted. The impugned notice was set aside and all subsequent proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1448 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311744</link>
      <description>A notice issued under Section 24(1) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 was challenged on the ground that its legality was already covered by an earlier Supreme Court decision and a subsequent order following that decision. On the parties&#039; joint submission and the covered nature of the issue, the challenge was accepted. The impugned notice was set aside and all subsequent proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>