<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1447 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311743</link>
    <description>A notice issued under Section 24(1) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 was held unsustainable because its legality was treated as covered by an earlier decision followed by the Court. On that basis, the parties jointly submitted that the notice could not be sustained and the proceedings founded on it could not continue. The Court accepted that position, set aside the notice and quashed the subsequent proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1447 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311743</link>
      <description>A notice issued under Section 24(1) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 was held unsustainable because its legality was treated as covered by an earlier decision followed by the Court. On that basis, the parties jointly submitted that the notice could not be sustained and the proceedings founded on it could not continue. The Court accepted that position, set aside the notice and quashed the subsequent proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>