<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1631 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311737</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on service tax paid for outward transportation of goods up to the customer&#039;s premises was treated as admissible where the facts matched an earlier CESTAT ruling and the assessee had complied with the conditions, including the relevant CBEC circular. On that basis, the denial of credit was set aside and credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1631 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311737</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on service tax paid for outward transportation of goods up to the customer&#039;s premises was treated as admissible where the facts matched an earlier CESTAT ruling and the assessee had complied with the conditions, including the relevant CBEC circular. On that basis, the denial of credit was set aside and credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>