<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1441 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311736</link>
    <description>The petitioners stated that an FIR had been lodged against petitioner no. 2 under Section 366 IPC and that they did not wish to press the writ petition. The Court accepted the request and dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, leaving no adjudication on the merits of the challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1441 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311736</link>
      <description>The petitioners stated that an FIR had been lodged against petitioner no. 2 under Section 366 IPC and that they did not wish to press the writ petition. The Court accepted the request and dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, leaving no adjudication on the merits of the challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>