https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311732 The Bombay High Court noted that the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee under the Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act is a statutory body of limited jurisdiction, and that individual parents had no implied locus standi to invoke it where the statute confined the reference process to specified contingencies. It also noted that the Committee's role was limited to fee disputes and incidental matters, so it could not direct reconstitution of the Parent-Teachers Association or its Executive Committee. On that basis, the fee committee orders were treated as beyond statutory power and unsustainable. en-us Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:26:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311732 The Bombay High Court noted that the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee under the Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act is a statutory body of limited jurisdiction, and that individual parents had no implied locus standi to invoke it where the statute confined the reference process to specified contingencies. It also noted that the Committee's role was limited to fee disputes and incidental matters, so it could not direct reconstitution of the Parent-Teachers Association or its Executive Committee. On that basis, the fee committee orders were treated as beyond statutory power and unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311732