https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311731 The HC dismissed the revision petition challenging the Additional District & Sessions Judge's order, which affirmed the Metropolitan Magistrate's decision in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner's request to recall a witness for further cross-examination was denied, as it was deemed a delay tactic. The HC found no prejudice to the petitioner and emphasized the importance of procedural efficiency. The court directed the trial court to expedite the trial, discouraging unnecessary adjournments and highlighting the need for timely justice. en-us Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:26:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311731 The HC dismissed the revision petition challenging the Additional District & Sessions Judge's order, which affirmed the Metropolitan Magistrate's decision in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner's request to recall a witness for further cross-examination was denied, as it was deemed a delay tactic. The HC found no prejudice to the petitioner and emphasized the importance of procedural efficiency. The court directed the trial court to expedite the trial, discouraging unnecessary adjournments and highlighting the need for timely justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311731