<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 501 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448102</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the jurisdiction of tax authorities under CGST Act, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge to an order passed under Section 130. The court found the writ petition non-maintainable, emphasizing the availability of an alternative appeal remedy under Section 107. The ruling confirmed the authority&#039;s power to impose tax and penalties, dismissing procedural objections and maintaining the standard appellate mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=739663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 501 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448102</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the jurisdiction of tax authorities under CGST Act, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge to an order passed under Section 130. The court found the writ petition non-maintainable, emphasizing the availability of an alternative appeal remedy under Section 107. The ruling confirmed the authority&#039;s power to impose tax and penalties, dismissing procedural objections and maintaining the standard appellate mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>